It's the mid-point for the weekly extravaganza Countdown, and apparently -- according to this interview with Newsarama, at any rate -- some changes might be on the horizon...
1. “Let every book be itself.”
The oft-awkward pacing of other DC Comics to fit in with the overarching Countdown storyline had been somewhat of a disaster. Maybe Dan DiDio agrees? He says in the interview:
"Let every book be itself.” Let every story have its own pace. If someone feels, correctly or incorrectly, that their “experience” has been revealed in Countdown or revealed in say, Sinestro Corps War, that’s reflected in another series…I’m willing to make that sacrifice because at the end of the day, I’m confident that Countdown is better because Superman Prime appears at the moment he does, or more importantly, the Superman Prime storyline plays out in the way it does in Sinestro Corps War, and we don’t alter one story or the other."Will this mean that writers will have more freedom to develop/structure their plots and storylines outside of the iron-clad dictum of Countdown-Countdown-Countdown?
I think that some writers have been alienated by that level of control and capitulation to the needs of the larger event. I don't just mean that the writers have been merely "inconvenienced." I mean, some might have been alienated, disgusted, straitjacketed, frustrated.
And the problem with taking so much independence from said writers is that post-Final Crisis success is going to be measured by how many skilled writers besides Grant Morrison is writing DCU.
2. Adding editorial boxes to clarify continuity and crossover issues.
See, I think the utter pomposity of DC in interviews regarding their refusal to add the editorial boxes in Countdown did a lot to cheese off readers. I mean, obviously there was a problem, there was confusion. But instead of responding to that, DC got defensive. They were like: "you said we made a mistake but we didn't and just to show we didn't we will not change one iota."
But in the inteview DiDio says:
"And this is where we’re going to be adding in editorial boxes that will tell readers what’s up if a character’s appearance or actions don’t reflect their actions or appearance in any other issues at the time, it will say something like, “Read Green Lantern #25.” Again, I don’t want any individual story to suffer just to make things line up perfectly."This is rule one not only of interacting with comic book readers but with today's consumers in general: get off the high horse. Have a dialogue with them. Respond to their feedback. Adapt.
3. The "bounce" towards the Final Crisis.
C'mon, who wouldn't guess that there would be an effort to make the last issues of Countdown better in an attempt to maximize sales for Final Crisis?
"I believe the series has leveled off, and I’m hoping that we see a little bit of a bounce moving towards the conclusion, because I feel that people will start to respond more to the things that are going on in the series itself in the sense of they’ll feel that things are occurring at a much more rapid pace. I’m also suspecting that we’ll pick up more readers as we get closer to Final Crisis because people are going to want to see what the line is between Countdown and Final Crisis itself. And I think that if anyone is coming to this series curious to see what’s going on, they’re going to be excited by it, because rather than being exhausted at this point, everyone is pushing as hard as they can, and there’s a lot of energy on those pages."Which is a noble sentiment, I guess, but the proof will be in the execution.
In closing, I'll leave off with Dan's description of why Superman Prime has captured the imagination of readers:
"Sure, he’s the Anti-Superman, but more than that, some of the greatest villains you can face are the ones who are single-minded, and above all, who don’t see that they’re a threat or a villain in any way. No villain wakes up in the morning, spins their moustache, and says, “I’m going to be villainous today.” They have incredible justification for all of their actions, no matter how horrific they are. That’s what makes Superman Prime great – he believes he’s working towards something better. He believes he’s doing the right thing, and he truly believes that the ends justify the means. He is so adamant about his beliefs that he is completely combative with anyone who disagrees with him. He has complete belief in his convictions, and is willing to do whatever it takes to implement them."
I'll be curious to see if S-Prime's suppossed popularity hold out after those Countdown appearances. They were godawful, and turned a slightly twisted character into a whiny (whinier, anyway), completely disconnected from reality, genocidal psychopath.
ReplyDelete"This is rule one not only of interacting with comic book readers but with today's consumers in general: get off the high horse. Have a dialogue with them. Respond to their feedback. Adapt."
ReplyDeleteYou're absolutely right. I can speak to this as someone who represents a company's engineering interests in a certain area and has to work with vendors my company pays to do things for us. One vendor is very nice and quick to both give me feedback and adapt to any problem I bring up. The other takes a very aggressive, hostile attitude and flatly tells me I'm wrong or I don't understand the bigger picture or whatever. When either company makes a mistake, guess which one I'm more forgiving of.
I think DC is having the same problem with its communication to their customers. I believe wholeheartedly there was an executive decision to start editorial boxes in Countdown to help people. But when a DC representative aggressively points out that the readers are wrong for not knowing what's going on, then it makes it hard to accept a good faith concession on face value.
In general, I think that interview did a lot to improve my opinion of Dan DiDio...his previous public statements have tended to have an element of CYA to them, a sort of sense of, "No, that wasn't a mistake, that was all part of a bigger plan!" behind even obvious mistakes.
ReplyDeleteAdmitting, "Yes, this hasn't worked as well as we hoped, and we're fixing some problems," that impresses me. This felt like the most honest he'd ever been with DC's audience, and I liked that.
(I still think DC is heading in the wrong direction, mind, but we'll see where they're at in a year.)
Nice placement of that final quote. It's ... ouch!
ReplyDeleteI've said it before, but I like SuperBOY-prime. Superman-prime eh. I think the emphisis on youth makes him much more telling.
ReplyDeleteEmoboy Prime or WhineyBoy Prime works best for me.
ReplyDeleteAlso, the whole editorial box thing is interesting because i'm sure this is like, the millionth time Dan DiDio has said "yeah uh, we're bringing in editorial boxes shortly".
They never do, and then they promise them again, and then they never appear.
Again.
I agree with John Seavey that DD came off very well in that interview, and would only add that he came off especially well in comparison to Mike Carlin, who's been prickly (to say the least!) in his Friday interviews with Newsarama.
ReplyDeleteI do think that Countdown has gotten better over the past few weeks (of course, it pretty much had nowhere to go but up), and am hopeful that it will continue to improve as we get towards FC.
That’s what makes Superman Prime great – he believes he’s working towards something better. He believes he’s doing the right thing, and he truly believes that the ends justify the means. He is so adamant about his beliefs that he is completely combative with anyone who disagrees with him. He has complete belief in his convictions, and is willing to do whatever it takes to implement them."
ReplyDelete...
...
...they say that the unexamined life is not worth living, Mr DiDio.
I'm just saying
Villains who think they're doing something (ultimately) good are indeed interesting and can be compelling, but they're not the only kind of villain that makes for good stories. Jealously, greed, desperation, thrills, perverse glee, hatred...these are all solid motivations for villains. I'm getting tired of the villains who want to "make things right" (Alexander Luthor, Sinestro, the bad Monitors, Superboy/man Prime, etc.). Some of Shakespeare's villains have purposefully obscure motivations. Done right, that can be very compelling, since in life we often can't fully explain our own or others' destructive behavior.
ReplyDeleteAnd i think there are--or certainly can legitimately be in fiction--villains who wake up, twirl their mustache, and decide to go out and do villainy: b/c it turns them on, b/c it harms someone they hate, etc. It is certainly possible to be driven to do something that you know is wrong, when some force in your life overcomes your morality and compassion.
A mundane example: do we all think that eating junkfood is good? No, we admit it's bad, but we do it anyway b/c we value the pleasure of it more than good health.
@ Mordicai
ReplyDeleteI agree with you, but I think that has to do more with DC legal than DC editorial.