Friends Of Lulu Assemble! + A New Home For The Lulu Awards

I'm pleased to announce that Friends of Lulu has assembled an unofficial, interim Board of Directors. Volunteers have stepped forward to take on the following roles:
  • Interim Treasurer
  • Interim Director of Communications
  • Interim Membership Secretary
  • Interim Recording Secretary

These persons have generously offered their time to assist FoL, and will be an invaluable help to the organization. So Kynn, Gemma, David, and Richard: thank you!!!!!!

Please note that though we have an interim Board of Directors, all immediate responsibilities for the time being lie with myself in the Presidential role. It is my hope that if all goes well, we can make this an official Board.

The only Friends of Lulu event and initiative planned for the rest of 2010 is the Lulu Awards, in order to keep the continuity of this unique award going.

A particular comic convention has generously offered use of their space to hold the Lulu Awards, as well as a panel. They have also offered us a table at the Con. When this deal becomes final and official, we will make a big announcement.

Glad to have some good news to impart to you on this front as we head into the weekend.

20 Future Trends For The Comic Industry

The following 20 future trends for the comic industry (and fandom) is scheduled roughly for the next two years -- by 2012. They are based on a combination of market research and intuitive insight. My track record for previous predictions is quite good, as I have successfully predicted things like the DC restructuring and Disney buying up Marvel a couple of years before they actually happened.

If you find the list below useful, please consider making a small donation to this blog at the PayPal button on the left sidebar.


1. SDCC Name Change:
By 2012, the San Diego ComicCon will have a name change to either something like "Comic & MediaCon" or just drop the word "comic" out of the name completely.


2. "YouTube" of Comics:
I compare this upcoming online database of comics to YouTube only in terms of its large breadth of material and ease of browsing. It will be initially "seeded" by a significant collection of unlicensed scanned comic material, but will be open to user uploads. This collection might also be part of a larger "YouTube" of books, or inspired by it. Much different than Scribd, Scans Daily, Google Books, etc. in terms of its scope of material and popularity. So say you want to read something weird like "Man From Atlantis" #3. You type it in, the comic comes up, and you have the option of either viewing it in a reader or downloading it. Look for this by end of 2011.


3. West Coast as Center of Comics Publishing:
The West Coast will largely be the destination for comic book publishing by 2012. California, Oregon, Washington, but mostly in CA. This is largely due to its proximity to movie studios, but also to that of Silicon Valley.


4. Non-Localized Comic Publishing Staff:
During the next two years, the trend towards non-localized staff at comic publishers -- telecommuters -- will increase. This might be in part due to the exodus to the West Coast, but it also follows general trends in employment.


5. iPad/Digital Reader Mainstreamed:
By the end of 2011, the iPad and other digital readers will be "mainstreamed" as the method of choice for reading books, magazines, and comics. By 2012, printed material will have the same status CDs have now.


6. The Big Changeover:
The changeover from print to digital in the comics industry should happen quite suddenly, by SDCC (or, "SDCMC" or "SDMC") of 2012. It will seem very sudden, but will have been planned out beforehand. By "changeover" I mean:
  • Standardization of day-and-date digital release
  • Sharp decrease in # of print titles

7. Centralization of Digital Comics Distribution:
Though there are a number of digital comics distributors at the moment, this will whittle down sharply by end of 2011. The corporate partners/parents of major comics publishers might want to provide sole digital distribution themselves, or one central distributor will emerge.


8. Narrowing The Talent Door:
While the comics publishers will still scout for new talent, they will also be more likely to do so through talent agencies than comic cons. Prospective freelance talent might start needing professional representation in terms of literary or art agents. "Talent pools'' will be created to serve the needs for specific projects created by editorial/marketing staff, rather than new projects being brought to the major publishers by talent. Access to editors will be at an unprecedented minimum.


9. The Blurring Of Job Duties:
  • Editors will often find themselves as the first uncredited "writer" or "plotter" of a comic.
  • Comic creators will also increasingly be expected to do the jobs of editors -- if there even is a true editor on the project.
  • Marketing professionals will be an integral part of the project creation process. Editors will be required to have the instincts of marketers.

10. Buy-Outs by Entertainment Conglomerates:
The trend of comics publishers being purchased by larger parent companies will continue. Mid-level comic publishers might suddenly become top publishers through buy-outs and increased money from these parent companies. The need of a "research and development" wing and a dedicated "studio" to adapt their movie/TV/videogame properties will be a major factor for these conglomerates. Watch for a couple of major purchases by end of 2011, especially concerning publishers who already put out a lot of licensed material.


11. Buy-Outs by Traditional Publishers:
Traditional publishers, hurting from the digital revolution, will increasingly turn to the comic publishers of reprint materials and original graphic novels. This is because a large, folio-sized reprint edition or lush, tactile hardcover graphic novel provide an experience that an iPad or eReader cannot. Look for one major purchase by a traditional book publisher of a very established "indy" comic publisher by 2011.


12. The Broadening of Genres:
The digital revolution -- and increase in the mass market comic audience -- will necessitate the cultivation of comics in genres outside of the traditional superhero narrative. The most up-and-coming genres are:
  • Children's
  • Teens/Romance
  • Fantasy/Sword-and-Sorcery/Post-Apocalyptic Wasteland (pre-2012 anxiety)
  • Biography/History/News (somewhat of a "new category")
  • Licensed Movie/TV adaptations

13. The Changing Demographics of the Comic Reader:
By 2012, the demographics of those reading comic book material will more closely resemble that of the Golden Age 70 years previous: sharp increases in females and especially children. This will be due largely to the rise in digital comics, and the opening up of the industry to the masses instead of a specialized sub-group.


14. The Split In Comics Markets:
The market for comic book material will be split into two main segments:
  1. Digital comics delivery, on a day-and-date basis
  2. Elaborate collected editions and first-run graphic novels

15. The Comic Retailer as Book Retailer:
Any smart comics retailer right now is cultivating a customer base for collected editions and first-run graphic novels. Digital comics can never replicate the lush and tactile feel of a hardcover book. Certainly, book editions of comics are not a mass-market product category -- yet. But this is where the biggest growth will be for comics retailers.


16. The "Core" Print Floppies:
The market for print floppies will shrink to a core group of tried-and-true brands: Superman, Spider-Man, Batman, etc. Any titles that are not immediately related to the core groups will be released in digital first, then (if sales warrant it), print collected editions -- the floppies will be skipped completely. There will also be a smaller core group of children's titles based on well-known children's properties.


17. Midwest & The South: The Floppies' Last Stand
The market for monthly print editions will continue in the Midwest & the Southern regions of the United States longer than any other. This follows the general stable/upward trend of print periodicals in those regions (while print in the rest of the country continues to plummet). A traditional comics retailer in those regions might flourish far longer than those in New York or California. But this might also then create an overall more conservative audience for mainstream superhero comics.


18. Increased "Fanboy" Insularity
In the early stages of this overall sea change in the landscape & character of the comic book industry, the former "core" comics market of hardcore male fans (25-50) will get more insular and resistant to outsiders. This will even be the case, to a much more limited extent, with the remnants of old-school types from within comics publishing itself. There will be a last ditch effort to "kill" progress for comics from both these fans and on behalf of those still within comics publishing. The mentality is that of: "if I cannot control it, it is better off dying with me."


19. 2011: The Year Of Superhero Movie Fatigue
The general wisdom is that the success for superhero-based films is what makes the comic publishers valuable to Hollywood. But after the year of "Superhero Fatigue," this will be reversed. Then the comic companies will become more valuable for Hollywood as multi-media producers of spin-off entertainment based on pre-existing movie & TV material.


20. Aging Freelancers In Crisis
Due to the above developments, many freelancers will increasingly find themselves cut out of the loop. This will be the combined result of:
  • More writers being cultivated from TV, Movies, and Books
  • The near-complete digitization of the comic art creation process and delivery
  • The increasing requirement of having an agent or other representation
  • The direct access to editors being blocked in favor of "talent pools"
  • General "ageism" in the industry
The amount of aging freelancers unable to find work in their chosen field will skyrocket, even greater than it is at present. There will not only be financial but health crises as well. Assistance and education will be crucial.

There is so much more I could touch upon, but these 20 will do for now. Hope it helps, or at least gives you something to think about!


The Paradigm

I think I'd just address one more thing, while I'm getting stuff off my chest.

I still love comics. But the old mainstream paradigm, for the most part, doesn't work for me anymore. It has been, to a degree, toxic to the women who tried (and continue to try) to love it. Not so much now, in this present generation -- but definitely in the last generation. Friends of Lulu was built as a direct reaction to the toxicity of that mainstream comics paradigm. When people question why FoL has had such a troubled existence, I really feel it is at least partially the result of trying to live within a paradigm that is ultimately toxic to you. It's the result of living with the constant stress and conflicted feelings that paradigm produces.

Having comics be essentially "taken over" by hardcore male fans -- blocking out women, and eventually children -- is ultimately the worst thing that ever happened to this industry. I'm not talking "worst" in terms of the ethical reasons -- but just from a simple business standpoint alone. The "fanboy revolution" killed not only the female market, but also the children's market. Alienating 1/2 of the population is one thing -- but then to knowingly cut off the future generation of readers as well! Remarkably short-sighted and selfish.

But I think the problem is that groups like FoL and pro-kids comics organizations have made short gains in a sphere that have tossed a bone here or there, but ultimately continue to bounce back into their protective, selective shell. And so I think the biggest change will not happen within the mainstream paradigm. That's the whole point, really -- it couldn't change within the paradigm.

Instead, the mainstream paradigm, in the face of new technology and the sharply changing demographics of readership, will simply shrink.

In the midst of this sea change -- which is happening right now -- is the impotent rage of those watching the change but refusing to participate for whatever reason. Some have enjoyed the power of being the majority and don't want to let that go. Some have made a cottage industry of being the victim of the paradigm's toxicity, and don't want to lose the sense of identity it has afforded them. Some have invested a great deal in the monopoly of the paradigm.

But me? I love the change. I hunger to escape a paradigm that has always been hostile to my infiltration of it. I relish the removal of myself from the stress and conflicted feelings and self-loathing that the paradigm has always engendered in me.

That's why when this or that person comments on how hostile some hardcore male comic fans are towards me on this or that message board, this or that website -- how else would they react to someone like me? I mean really. They would have no reason to like me. I represent everything that threatens their paradigm in both the macrocosm and the personal microcosm. I have met a few of these most vocal critics in person and trust me it is quite the eye-opener. I not only wrote the Punisher and I'm a girl (horrors!)...but I'm tall, too.

And so I support digital comics, and children's comics, and independent creators -- you know, any realm where I don't constantly have the feeling that I'm a 2nd-class citizen either violently shoved in my face or respectfully presented to me with a sincere apology. I also quite enjoy the classics -- anything from the start of comics to about the very early 1990s (when the paradigm started to go into severe entrenched hyper-mode). So I'm a big fan of collected editions and trades. And licensed comic adaptations are also a secret guilty pleasure of mine.

But the paradigm? I do not need to rally against the paradigm, criticize the paradigm, lose sleep over the paradigm, cry that the paradigm "don't seem to wuv me!" I don't have to cut off my toes and heels like Cinderellas's sisters and make that particular shoe fit. I no longer want to make the paradigm happy, try to make it "understand me," try to make it accept me, try to make myself palatable to it.

Please: enjoy that mainstream paradigm, still spry in its youthful decrepitude like an aging Burt Ward in a pair of Hanes and a domino mask. I wouldn't think of disturbing the boys' clubhouse. I'll be in the high-rise next door.


Men Can Volunteer At Lulu Too!

Just a quick message, men can volunteer at Friends of Lulu and be considered for a place on their Board of Directors. This is in answer to several men who wanted to help but weren't sure if they were "eligible" for a place on the Board.

"Lulu Is For Everyone"

Lulu Addendum

I want to thank the people who have written to me in support about Friends of Lulu and have offered their time.

As for those people who sit behind their computer screens and publicly rage & complain, but don't offer to lift a finger to help: well, that pretty much says it all, doesn't it?

I have plenty of emails on file from persons who criticise why I do not do even more for FoL, yet decline to help out. So this is all not shocking to me. We used to joke that the quickest way we could get someone to stop emailing Lulu was to ask them for help.

As for the orgasmic thrill of getting together on the Internet and ragging on somebody -- I get it. The two minutes you take to do that probably yields a heck of a lot more immediate return on investment than the two hours I spend on the phone with a lawyer or the ten hours I use to build a website in order to help Friends of Lulu.

And when some persons reminisce about the "good ol' days" of Lulu, before those terrible people arrived to ruin everything...we should then also talk about how eyebrows were raised back then at the use of Lulu funds for personal business trips. About the story of the treasurer who would "accidentally" confuse the Lulu account for her own and take money out of it. Sure everything's rosy when oversight is at a minimum. Running a non-profit is a snap without worrying about keeping up with all those confusing status and tax forms.

Yes, I made two big mistakes with Friends of Lulu:
  1. Pushing for change
  2. Asking questions
But I'm not ashamed of doing either, because FoL was way overdue for both. If this is what it has to take to remove the rot and either rebuild or start anew, then I'm proud. I'm not an enabler, or a liar, or a hypocrite claiming to be Lulu's biggest supporter but not doing anything worth a damn to save this organization for women in comics.

I'm sure if I just let everything go to hell, never questioned the paperwork or tried to fix anything, drained the bank accounts for my own self-promotion, said whatever sound byte-perfect cliched line about women in comics to please the press, and then knowingly left the position to an unwary young woman to deal with the eventual fallout, I'd be a hero right now. And sitting pretty. But I also wouldn't be able to live with myself.

Are Webcomics Dead?


I was originally going to just post this on my Digital Comics Blog, but upon reflection the topic is so potentially huge I wanted a bigger audience's opinion.

I found this post by Joey Manley (founder of the Modern Tales webcomic site) , entitled, "The Death of Webcomics?"

"But when it comes to the field as a whole, the excitement I used to feel about webcomics-as-a-movement? Eh. I dunno. Things have started to settle down. I don’t see the crazy innovative risk-taking, the sense that anything might happen, and would happen, and if you blinked you might miss it. That feeling that we could go strange new places with this medium, and invent unthinkable new things, just isn’t there. Webcomics have become solid, professional, well-written, beautifully drawn, and, um, well, normal.

That’s what we wanted. Right?

Right?

Then why do I find it so hard to remember to read them with any regularity these days?"

That post was followed up by a more recent one, entitled: "Leapfrog: Direct Market Giants Dominate The Direct Market Scene" --

"The point I want to underline, though, is that the big publishers, and the old-school properties, are where all the action is in the iPad digital comics scene. Webcomic entrepreneurs have been as clumsy in taking advantage of this new platform, have seemed (to this observer, anyway) to be as stuck in their ways, as entrenched and established and slow-moving, as print comics publishers were back in the early days of webcomics. That’s something I never would have expected. That’s leapfrog."

What do you think? Has the webcomics scene lost its pizazz? Have the big publishers "leapfrogged" the indy upstarts of webcomics land? Does the iPad herald the "death" of webcomics as we know it?

Or are rumors of their death greatly exaggerated?

NonCon 2010: The Alternative to SDCC!


On Saturday, July 24th a very special convention was going on...no, not that one!

NonCon, the brainchild of Steve Ellis, Mike Zagari, and Jamal Igle, was designed to give those New Yorkers who weren't able to make it to SDCC a chance to mingle and have some comic-related fun.


Held at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art, the event featured refreshments, a raffle, and plenty of comic book art. NonCon was attended by such comic luminaries as Ellis, Igle, Fred VanLente, Molly Crabapple, David Gallaher, Sean Murphy, Zelda Devon, Kurt Huggins, Bill Roundy, Greg Pak, Janine & Ken Frederick, Nate Cosby, Janelle Siegel, and Sarah Litt. Artists including Igle, Ellis, Ben Caldwell, and Robin Riggs sketched throughout the festivities, and donated the pieces to MoCCA.

A good time was had by all, and there are definitely plans to have a NonCon again next year.

Robin Riggs shows off his Hulk sketch, donated to MoCCA


Jamal Igle demonstrates his art skills


Steve Ellis draws Thor


Steve Ellis, Valerie D'Orazio, Molly Crabapple

The Friends of Lulu Post

I had been advised several times to be discrete about what has been going on at Friends of Lulu, as to protect their image. The thought was: if we admit that Lulu was in trouble, it would just demonstrate that women are incapable of running an organization. It would hurt the cause of Women in Comics.

While whether being silent on these issues truly helps FoL is debatable, it has become very clear that it has not helped me in the least. It has only really set me up as the focal point for speculation, and perhaps even blame. It has also isolated me (and in turn, Lulu) from potential assistance, and brought a tremendous burden squarely down on my shoulders alone. This has to end today.

So I am going to set the record straight. Everything I write here can be backed up by documentation.

My first year at Lulu was a time of unprecedented outreach and growth for the organization. FoL was still recovering from public censure over a number of issues. Their infrastructure was also in dire need of an update. And so though the new board of directors had many dreams and plans for Lulu, we were realistic enough to know that 2008 was going to be about a lot of behind-the-scenes "heavy lifting."

Here are some examples of the the work we did that first year:

Our new Membership Secretary spent countless volunteer hours updating our member database. This was huge for us, because it was very outdated and we had previously received a lot of returned mail with the wrong address.

It had been so long since the official FoL website had been updated, nobody -- not even the web service provider -- knew how to get into the system and edit it. The situation became dire because we had outdated information on many women in our directory that was turning up in search engines. Out of desperation, I blocked out a couple of weekends to build a new website from scratch.

Doing outreach for new members and donors throughout the comics community, I was shocked at how many people had a negative opinion of Lulu. Some still held grudges against the organization from more than ten years previous. Person-by-person, I worked to address their issues and cast the organization in a more favorable light. At times this involved me making elaborate apologies on behalf of Lulu for things that happened way before I was connected to the organization. The result: record donation and memberships, and opening lines of communication that were previously considered irrevocably closed.

Since I lived in New York City, I worked closely with the NY Friends of Lulu chapter to help revitalize that part of the organization and come up with new strategies to increase membership.

We restarted the Friends of Lulu mentorship program, and completed a mentorship with a talented young woman who wanted to become a manga artist.

We had a year of many successful convention appearances, culminating with a dazzling Lulu Awards at the Museum of Comic and Cartoon Art. The Lulu Awards had standing-room-only attendance. I had personally brought in a record amount of sponsorships for that awards ceremony, including one from DC Comics.

In an effort to save money, bring Lulu into the Digital Age, and increase outreach, I created an e-newsletter to replace our paper ones. This newsletter was designed to be sent out to members old and new on a bi-monthly, rather than quarterly, basis -- and specifically give them a platform to promote their work. There was some resistance to the e-newsletter from Lulu "veterans," who claimed that we were only doing it because we were too "lazy and/or incompetent" to continue the paper newsletters. In this and other initiatives to update Friends of Lulu, I often felt as if I was fighting a constant uphill battle against portions of the organization/membership who did not want change.

Finally, foundations were being built during 2008 to bring about wonderful things for the future. Among the possibilities being discussed:
  • A partnership with Zuda.com to have an online showcase of new female talent
  • A Friends of Lulu magazine
  • A new anthology book, perhaps sponsored/published by a major comics company
  • Revitalization of the "Junior Lulu" program
  • New Friends of Lulu merchandise
  • An even bigger convention presence
  • New chapters in other parts of the United States
It was an exciting time. Personally, I felt as if perhaps my previous heartbreaks related to the industry might have been worth it because it brought me to Friends of Lulu.

But during the transition of the Board of Directors in Spring of 2009, it was brought to my attention that there might have been a number of filing issues in terms of status and taxes that had either not been done, or done incorrectly, for years. The moment I found this out, I made the somewhat controversial decision to halt all acceptance of donations and memberships until it was straightened out. It might have all turned out to have been a false alarm -- but I didn't want to take that chance.

Further consultation with an accountant revealed even more potential filing issues. We were going to have to hire an accountant and bring our records in to take a closer look.

Unfortunately, an emergency situation with a board member halted all those efforts. During this situation, the boxes with all our financial records were either misplaced, thrown out, or were otherwise lost. We made a number of efforts, both by ourselves and through others, to get the records back, but by late 2009 it was clear that they were most likely gone. If these records are indeed never recovered, the person who was in charge of them will be held responsible.

By the Summer of 2009, another board member went on an extended vacation and would not be able to attend meetings for several months. With two members down, it was difficult to get a lot done, and the Board unofficially dissolved. I was left alone to handle these unresolved issues.

It was suggested to me during that time that I should still do the Lulu Awards, in order to maintain continuity. Unable to get anyone to help me, I had to eventually hire an assistant. The decision to make the awards "virtual" was mine, made out of necessity and a lack of free time.

Since then, I have had to handle everything myself as best as I knew how. I have spent countless hours going through what records I could find, trying to piece the last several years of our financial existence together. I have consulted a lawyer as to what can be done, and the amount of work that is going to take is going to be huge -- and without the boxes of records, pretty damn difficult.

The effect on myself of such misfortune to strike the organization after such a great year cannot be underestimated. This all happened roughly during the same time-frame in which my stepfather died, my mini-series was put on indefinite hiatus, and a client defaulted on payment. I was devastated and depressed. The advice I was given in regards to the Lulu situation (which had begun to take up ever-greater chunks of my time)? Don't say anything public. Do the best you can. You're doing great.

I now want to take this opportunity to itemize what money Friends of Lulu still has at the moment, what expenditures we made since freezing memberships/donations early last year, and what FOL materials I am currently in possession of.
  • We have roughly $1,800 in a bank account and a PayPal account.
  • Since Spring of 09 the Friends of Lulu accounts have been used for one organizational meeting for the Lulu Awards, the purchasing of the actual awards, and the shipment of said awards.
  • We have mailed out several packages to members as requested.
  • I also hired an assistant to help me with the Lulu Awards out of necessity, though she has yet to invoice for the work.
All of the above can be documented by records & receipts.

In my possession are:
  • Two sketchbooks filled with donated artwork.
  • Two boxes of "Girl's Guide To Guy's Stuff" books.
  • One scrapbook containing all the historical milestones and original art since the founding of the organization.
  • One binder filled with every FOL newsletter printed.
  • One box filled with Lulu documentation since the founding (non-financial).
  • Various membership materials and supplies.
  • Several pieces of donated art from artists like Gene Ha, Dustin Nguyen, and Donna Barr.
I have asked many people connected to Lulu for specific help in dealing with the issues as laid out earlier in this post. While I have gotten some good advice and insight, I have been pretty much left to deal with the nitty-gritty of this stuff -- including issues that were present before I became president -- by myself. So I will do what I can, in the time available to me.

After I resolve (IF I am indeed able to resolve) all these FoL issues, I have two choices:
  1. Donate the remaining money (if any) to a charity and officially dissolve FoL.
  2. Put FoL in the hands of a next generation.
The problem becomes this: running a non-profit is a tremendous responsibility. It requires a lot of time. It is not a hobby. Collecting money from people is serious business. I mean, I could lie and tell prospective new board members that it's all a piece of cake, that it's easy, that it's something you can do every now and then when you have some spare time. But it's not. It's a job. It's an unpaid volunteer job that needs a portion of your time every week in order to run smoothly.

Only persons with the requisite time, skills, and sense of responsibility can take on this work. I had already scouted for a potential new board of directors, but nobody wanted to take it on. If anybody feels they can take on the rigors of running a true non-profit, please contact me.

If by September 2010 nobody steps forward and shows interest in helping run this organization, I will start taking steps to officially dissolve it as a non-profit. Then I will donate the leftover money (if any) between the other major comics charities, return the donated artwork, and ship the historical records and sketchbooks to a University or MoCCA.

Before I would take steps to dissolve FoL (if it comes to that), I will personally contact a number of concerned parties via a mass email asking for volunteers to keep the organization going.

Other options for Lulu are configurations outside of non-profit status, that are easier to manage or more directly address the needs of women in comics today. Personally, I think women in comics could really benefit from a professional organization that stresses networking, education, and how to break into the industry. Such a professional organization would require a different status filing than a non-profit, but I think would be more concretely helpful.

Is Friends of Lulu an organization whose time has come and gone? Is it time for a change? Has their mission been accomplished? Some people love the organization -- or at least, the idea of it. And some have expressed inexplicable hostility towards even the thought of a women's organization in comics. In terms of the latter, some of the most hostile persons towards Lulu have been women themselves.

I personally feel that things for women in comics are as good as it is going to get in the mainstream comics world. I still feel that there are things that are unfair, and that as a woman I am at a disadvantage. Especially as a female writer who wants to write "male" comics (and has received threats because of it). But I don't know how much a non-profit group is going to do to change that. I ultimately believe that market forces are going to change that. Digital comics are going to change that. Naturally changing demographics are going to change that. Corporate restructurings are going to change that.

But I do think there is a place for honoring the women that have come before us, and educating the future. Whether that is a non-profit, or a group, or a collection in a University, or an online collective -- I hope that something is created.

I would be remiss if I didn't thank the two people who dutifully stuck by Lulu the longest: Charlie Boatner and Marc Wilkofsky. These two people, longer than any others, continued to check in, forward mail, follow up, and offer what help they could give.

Also, my thanks to Danna for all her hard work and care with the Lulu Awards.

I wish I had the unlimited time and energy to make Friends of Lulu a full-time job. But between work and other responsibilities, it has become too hard to do by myself. I did the best I could with what I had -- and I'm going to do the best I can with what resources & time are available to me.

Maybe it's time for a new start.

But if it is true that "Lulu Is For Everybody," then the burden of responsibility lies not just with me.

Is Wildstorm DC's Digital Comics Savior?

I find it quite ironic that Wildstorm, which for at least the last several years has been derided (rightly or wrongly) as a DC "loss leader," provides the publisher with a good deal of their best-performing content in the digital comics arena.

Not only is Planetary a consistent top performer on DC's comic app and the comiXology app, but titles that many people in the direct market may have overlooked, like Mirror's Edge and Fringe, are getting a new life as popular downloads.

One big reason: LICENSED MATERIAL.

Licensed material is going to be a huge component of digital comics sales. This is because the mass market is attracted to properties with which they are already familiar. A comic based on the TV series Supernatural, for example, is going to do a lot better with that market than the rather arcane adventures of some highly continuity-based DC Universe series.

In the traditional market, these titles often get lost in the shuffle. Digital comics is the delivery system that brings these movie/TV/bestseller novel/videogame/cartoon adaptations directly to the audience who would most appreciate them. But more than that: I predict the audience for those comics will be far bigger than anybody would have imagined.

So one of the keys to the digital comics revolution is licensed content. Expect a huge boom in this category.

As a side-note: other "non-traditional" content like Jonah Hex, and titles from Vertigo & Zuda, also do very well in the digital arena.

TOP COMICS ON THE DC APP:
#1: Planetary
#2: Jonah Hex
#3: Justice League: Generation Lost
#4: Batman Black & White
#5: Tiny Titans
#6: The Losers
#7: Dante's Inferno
#8: Fringe
#9: Mirror's Edge
#10: Gen 13
#11: Green Lantern: Rebirth
#12: Superman/Batman
#13: Fables
#14: Wildcats vol. 5
#15: DMZ
#16: Green Lantern Corps
#17: The Unwritten
#18: Batman
#19: Green Lantern vol. 5
#20: Stormwatch: PHD
#21: High Moon
#22: Action Comics
#23: Sandman
#24: Bayou
#25: Green Lantern: Sinestro Corps

source: DC Comics App, July 25, 2010

"The Hot Chicks Of SDCC"


Wow. Just...wow.

But hey, it's great we've increased the attendance of women at these conventions, no? "Girls with glasses are hot!" "Girls who read comics are hot!" No, we're not considered "weird" anymore -- now we're official fetishes!

I was going to write more -- and actually did, but erased it -- but as I've been reminded many times, I'm often "too honest for my own good." Gonna put that energy into my digital blog instead, and towards true change vs. rants that go nowhere.