Pages

Showing posts with label supergirl. Show all posts
Showing posts with label supergirl. Show all posts

Friday, January 23, 2009

Occasional Links: Obama, Phantom Zone Sirens, Dumpy Sabretooth, more


Dan Goldman's Obama webcomic for Tor.com, "Yes We Will," re-imagines our new president via a Philip K. Dick fever-dream. To summarize, It's 2012 and Barack Obama is ready to usher in a new age for mankind...


Phantom Zone Supergirl...


...and Phantom Zone Madonna



Beanie Babies makers Ty insist that any similarities between their "Marvelous Malia" and "Sweet Sasha" dolls and any First Family is totally coincidental:

"The Oak Brook-based company chose the dolls' names because "they are beautiful names," not because of any resemblance to President Obama's daughters, said spokeswoman Tania Lundeen."
Frankly, I expected more frankness and candor from the creators of Oats the Horse and Swirly the Snail.



Is it really fair to nominate spoof movies like "Meet The Spartans" and "Disaster Movie" for Razzie awards? These movies freely admit they are dumbass. Were there not better movies to nominate? It's like making fun of farts for smelling bad.


Dan at the Mind Leak blog has envisioned his own version of the cover to Final Crisis #7...

...and Rich at Comic-by-Comic just "Can't Believe It's Not The Black Lanterns"


And finally, Liev Schreiber talks to Details about the upcoming movie "Wolverine":


"I started to read blogs in the comic world with things like 'That's the dumpiest, most out-of-shape Sabretooth I've ever seen in my life!'"

Being dissed on a blog? Who would have thought it!

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Mary Marvel Cooch Cover Benefit Dinner For Free Speech


Comic by Comic points out this cover by the usually awesome Alex Ross, showing an upskirt panty shot of Mary Marvel. There is some criticism about this cover, as it sexualizes a teen character.

But if we are working from the premise that even hard core illustrated depictions of teens and children are okay -- because they don't "hurt" anybody -- why should anybody get upset at this cover?

It's well-known that there is a big market for "barely legal" depictions of teenage girls. In the interest of free speech, shouldn't DC (or any other company) be allowed to have covers like this? Especially if it could bring in more money?

In fact, the sexualized teen Supergirl should have been defended by free speech advocates in the same manner as other high-profile cases, right? The fact that DC felt they were "forced" to change Supergirl (and I don't care what their official story is on the matter, I know better) was a blow for free expression, right? The equal of if Alan Moore was asked to cut scenes out of "Lost Girls," right?

But it all boils down to the following...

This is "low-brow" comics:
And this is "high-brow" comix:


No one is ever going to do a free-speech dinner for DC's right to publish images of sexualized teens in their superhero comic books. Even DC themselves would be too damn embarrassed to attend that dinner.

But if we are talking about freedom of expression, then isn't DC in the right if they want to publish covers like the above Mary Marvel image? And if that is the case, aren't "feminist bloggers" who complain about this and other "sexist" imagery in comics really against freedom of expression? In fact, isn't a lot of what feminists complain about as being "sexist" in the media just -- AGAINST FREE SPEECH? And if *that's* the case -- shouldn't they be publicly called out on it by self-appointed crusaders of Assorted Freedoms?

Lastly, if we are saying that any drawn image is "okay" because it's only imaginary and not hurting anyone, should there be any complaints about racist imagery? For example, those who are against Memin Pinguin. Or how about Jack Chick? To rail about Jack Chick's portrayal of a number of groups of people -- homosexuals, Catholics, Pagans, etc. -- would be really railing against free expression, right? Even to be critical of the images undermines one's stated belief of "images are harmless." If the images are truly harmless -- why criticize them? Why not just live-and-let-live, like one big happy family of creative ideas in a free society?

And yet, comic book bloggers are going to still complain about this image and that. It's inevitable. And implicit in those complaints is the idea that though these images and stories are "imaginary" -- they have a potential to negatively impact others. And if those images have a potential to negatively impact others -- that means they are not essentially "harmless."

As for me, I don't care for the Mary Marvel image. But I know the audience it's catering to. A flash of cooch, a knowing smile. What do all those budding Hollywood child-actresses say in interviews? "I'm not yet a woman, but no longer a little girl! Tee-hee!" Hollywood does it too, all the time. Don't make it right, tho. But it's a mentality as tenacious as head lice.

I can see the blog headlines now:

"Comic Industry Goes All Out To Defend Mary Marvel Cooch Cover; Benefit Dinner Starring Moby."

Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Would You Want This Superheroine In Your Corner In A Fight?

Detail of the cover to Final Crisis #3

The Beat's analysis points out that this cover might not be presenting Supergirl as the brightest crayon in the box.

My take? I was actually more surprised that Final Crisis was still going on. That series totally fell off my radar. So in that case, this cover was actually a success, because it brought to my attention that Final Crisis is still taking place.

But possible anti-feminist interpretations of the art aside, what are these covers really contributing to the series? They tell me absolutely nothing about the story. They only bank off the idea that "icons sell."

And you know who is one of the very few artists who can pull off a successful non-narrative "icons sell" cover? Alex Ross. He could paint Herbie The Fat Fury on a cover and make it sell well. Plus, he doesn't paint Supergirl as if she has a half-eaten snickers bar in her cranium where her brain should be.


Wednesday, April 23, 2008

A Kinder, Gentler Supergirl


Kudos to DC on their newly-announced Supergirl title, "Supergirl: Cosmic Adventures In The Eighth Grade."

As I've said on this blog many times before, Supergirl is (or can be) an excellent character for young girls to look up to. And I think the idea of a sweet, sprightly, wholesome adolescent Supergirl is a great one...

My only disappointment regarding all this is that Dean Trippe isn't working on it. He started a powerful meme on redesigning Supergirl a year or so ago. And the art he did of a younger Kara touched many hearts:

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Pink Supergirl


You know, I saw this in some costume shop ad I clicked on Google and was like "what the hell?"

"Pink" Supergirl?

This is officially licensed material, here.

From the ad:

"Little Kara Zor-El, who has only known Krypton her whole life, is now on the Planet Earth. She's here to fight evil and to save the innocent along side her cousin, Superman. Includes a hot pink dress with attached cape, silver belt, and hot pink boot tops with silver trim."

When did Kara ever wear this outfit?

...

PINK SUPERGIRL?!

Well, anyway, it matches really well with the heart-shaped desert plates:

Friday, February 08, 2008

Fangirl Fridays: Where Is DC's Matt Fraction? (And Other Questions)

" I actually had a different approach to the character. I had an opening four-issue arc that was very, very different that I was going to do, and I took way too long to come up with it. I was right on time getting it in before my first issue deadline -- and of course I didn't tell anyone what I was going to do. [Laughs] Then I turned it in and found out that there was a very specific continuity problem with the core aspect of what I was going to do, and so I had to start over and go really, really fast to come up with something for the first issue. So I'm not where I should be with the character and what I want to do with her. "
--Kelley Puckett on his current run on Supergirl

The question popped into my mind as I entered the comic store the other day:

"Who is DC's Matt Fraction?"

Matt Fraction is of course the writer on The Punisher, Iron Fist, etc., the originator of the "kicksplode" school of comic writing. His style is very distinct and he is, what they refer to in the current nomenclature, as a "hot young writer" [Fat Cobra = Character of the Year!].

Marvel seems to be developing a whole stable of these new voices, it seems, not content to merely rest on the laurels of Bendis and Brubaker. Here are a few names just off the top of my head: Matt Guggenheim, Greg Pak, Brian Reed, Dan Slott, Daniel Way, Jason Aaron. The actual list is far longer than this.

On the other hand, DC's writing lineup hasn't really changed all that much in the last 5 years. Grant Morrison is still the guy All Hopes Are Hung Upon. Geoff Johns and Keith Giffen are still the emblematic DC writers. Judd Winick is still the guy nobody understands why he is still writing these books but somehow he is.

Around the time Countdown launched, DC seemed to have an influx of new writers, and the anticipation was great. Tony Bedard, Sean McKeever, Dwayne McDuffie. And yet, what has happened?

Bedard gets caught in a (to my mind) a particularly cruel game of "writer musical chairs." I haven't been able to read a long enough run of his DC work to formulate an opinion of it.

McKeever & McDuffie get their debuts tangled in the editorially-driven clusterf**k.

Veteran writers like Tom Peyer, Kelly Puckett, and Chuck Dixon are without warning suddenly plopped into existing titles, forcing them to hastily come up with a new storyline and direction. Bedard is now added to that mix with Birds of Prey.

A great writer like Will Pfeiffer gets crucified by readers for a miniseries that was largely out of his control, a slave to editorial dictates.

Mark Waid & Greg Rucka are for the moment out of the picture.

Pete Tomasi might be considered as part of the mix of DC's hot new crop of writers, but frankly the fact that he was so very recently an editor there and now suddenly has two high-profile titles makes it slightly harder for him to prove himself. Personally, I have not read enough of Nightwing to make a determination one way or the other.

Gail Simone is the great writer who has proven herself for years -- but if her current run on Wonder Woman doesn't do fabulous, DC will use her as an internal example of why "woman books don't sell, and women writers don't sell" (I've heard this argument before).

And then there is DC's most high-profile writer of all: DCU Editorial.

Case in point: Countdown, which reads like it was put together by robots, by the same manatees that write Family Guy. No humans actually wrote that series. It was just a bunch of post-it notes strung together. That series was written by overworked, jaded editors, not Paul Dini, McKeever, Bedard, et al.

So what is DC's game plan in terms of writers? Can it be that all the DCU books are lame ducks anyway because Final Crisis will change everything? Should I even bother buying another DCU book until that time?

If I was sitting in the DC executive seat (sometime around when pigs fly and that The Dark Knight Heath Ledger talking doll with a pull-string comes out), I'd probably look to get Brian Michael Bendis & JM Straczynski . I have no inside information on that, I'm just trending this out.

And if I was at Marvel, I'd find a way to complete my collection of the best and brightest and look up whatever young DC talent is left. Including Brian Wood, who would be the biggest prize of all. Again -- no inside information, I'm just trending this out. I'd also find a way to get Neil Gaiman doing more projects. Call it the Morrison Vs. Gaiman free-for-all.

That said, 2008, in my estimation, will be interesting. Because whatever the situation at DC, if it doesn't improve it will change. And for Vertigo this goes triple (tho Will Dennis on the whole seems like a good developer of new, "kicksplody" books).

The answer to a lot of these woes is to get editorial staff who can seek out aggressively new talent. And retain them. The best they have right now is Mike Marts. He was the result of a strategic investment on DC's part, poached from Marvel. And Joey Cavalieri is like their quiet talent hunter, especially for indy talent, though I don't think he gets the recognition for it that he deserves.

That "strategic investment" aspect should drive everything DCU does from this point forward. This industry is entirely too competitive to do otherwise. There is a whole wide world of talent out there. And there is talent under their own banner that have been mishandled.

Anyway, those were just some things that popped into my head as I was buying comics the other day. Have a great weekend!

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

DC Comics: A Game Of Musical Chairs


I'm thinking about it...

Take The Flash, for instance...

He's Bart Allen! Here is a bold new direction for him!
Oh no, we suddenly killed him off!
Now we're going back to the Mark Waid era and Wally West!
We're so excited, Mark has all these great things planned and we are going to do a massive PR push!
Oh, wait, Mark is leaving!
Guess what??? Tom Peyer is suddenly our new writer!
(gee, is everything Mark did going to be undone...)

Hey guess what, we've just been strongarmed to make Supergirl less cheesecake!
And we are going to have a whole new creative team and direction!
(a couple of issues later)
Hey guess what, we're having a whole new creative team! And going in a whole bold new direction!
(wait nobody cares anymore???)

Hey guess what, Tony Bedard is our hot new writer now!
He's going to be writing Batman and The Outsiders!
Oh wait, we suddenly changed our mind! Sorry!
Chuck Dixon will be the new writer on Batman and The Outsiders!
See, at DC, we keep you guessing!

Guess what, kids? Sean McKeever is our new writer on Birds of Prey!
Oh wait, he's not doing the book anymore -- Tony Bedard is!
You remember Tony, don't you?
He's the writer who was going to do Batman and the Outsiders!
I know what you're thinking: "is he going to stay on this book or are you going to pull the carpet out from under me again??"
That's life, kid: it's uncertain!!!! Man up!

Hey guess what: we are going to have a new artist on Teen Titans every other issue!
And two billion inkers!
We call it: Our Artist Showcase!

You know, pretty soon I think you're going to see a game of "editor musical chairs."

Monday, January 21, 2008

Occasional Links: The Is This Gratuitous Edition


Playboy On Comic Book Sex Symbols

From the Playboy blog:
"It’s our cover, and while we don’t feel the need to explain in detail our thought process, perhaps a step back is warranted. The story is called “Sex in America.” Wonder Woman is sexy. Her costume is red, white and blue, and she has stars on her hot pants – it suggests the American flag almost as much as Captain America’s does. But we like to put women on our covers, so Steve Rogers is SOL in this case."

(found through Journalista)

Beware, folks: this is the nexus-point between where When Fangirls Attack and Playboy meet in the blogosphere! Comets and small asteroids get pulled in by the tractor beam of their conjunction and crushed into those little smooth pebbles you get with those good-luck bamboo stalks.


Topless "Superman" Stunt Gets Singer Banned


Seems that going topless -- even for men -- is a violation against local broadcasting standards.

Wondering what part the big Supes logo had in the furor.


Chest Implants On The Rise...For Men

Speaking of men of steel, Fox News reports:

There were 409 pectoral implant procedures performed in 2006, a 99 percent increase over 2005, the San Francisco Chronicle reports.

You know, Fox News should do one of those "crisis" special reports on men getting the implants. Like:
"Our World In Turmoil: Pectoral Implants!"
"Are Men Getting Too Damn Pretty? What Does It Mean? Are Our Children At Risk?"

"Terrorism and Pec Implants: The Next Weapon Of Mass Destruction?"



In A Dark Alley, No One Can See Your Fishnets


The first promo pictures of Black Canary on Smallville have been released...


And Ragnell gives her a thumbs-up for realism & plausibility:

The makeup mask is interesting idea. If she has some quick way to smear it on like a spray or something like a solid rouge applicator (one of those big old-fashioned round bars that you could just smear circles on your cheeks with), it makes for a good quick change and won't fall off. But makeup like that doesn't seem to obscure the face very well. I suppose you could say it's a distraction. Between it and the fishnets and the dark alley no one is going to be able to properly describe her. She must have to carry wipes to clean it off.

In other news, this still sucks:


Desperately Seeking Lynda


Megan Gale talks about playing the world's most famous Wonder Woman in the now-delayed Justice League film.

"People used to tell me I looked like Lynda Carter."

As an aside, go Google "Megan Gale" in Google Image Search sometime (with SafeSearch Preferences Off)

Go on, I'll wait.

Now go Google Search "Lynda Carter Bobby Jo."

Go on, I'll wait.

Yes, today's "Occasional Links" has, in a sense, come full circle.

(Sorry, Keri Russell, new voice of the cartoon Wonder Woman, just has a tasteful nude-but-you-see-nothing Vanity Fair shot.)


Wonder Woman On "The OC"
Video: This Never Happens In Real Life, Folks, Unless You Are Some Big Time Comic Book Writer Or Perhaps Charlie Sheen



Sunday, November 25, 2007

It's Another Vidcast!

"The Occasional Superheroine Show"

This week on the show:

Wolvie gets pwned!

The Illuminati get off the hook!

Supergirl brushes her teeth!

Lower-level superheroes die!

Inappropriate laughter at a New God's expense!

And plenty more!

Hoo-boy!

Thursday, November 08, 2007

Occasional Reviews: Supergirl #23 and Ms. Marvel #21

If I had only waited to lump in my review of She-Hulk #22, we could have had a trifecta.


Supergirl #23, featuring the new creative team of Kelley Puckett, Drew Johnson, and Ray Snyder, starts out promising enough. Supergirl gets a mysterious package. What's in the box? Who gave it to her? And is Jean Loring involved? Many questions flood into your head. And then you see him. See who? Batman. But not just any Batman...stubble-faced creepy sorta crazy-looking Goddamn Batman. It's awesome. Did the editor put Goddamn Batman in on purpose? Was Drew Johnson given a stack of ASBAR to use as drawing reference? Who knows? It's not important.

Then Supergirl gets sucked into this sketchy galactic mission involving Superman and these Green Lantern dudes. It's all very colorful and Johnson's art is pretty. But it feels like a fill-in. It free-floats much as Supergirl herself does through space during most of the story. It isn't bad. It just that it's a vignette.

Drew Johnson's art isn't that much different than that of previous artist Renato Guedes, only there is a bit more hip-bone drawn in above the belt and it's not as photo-realistic. Most of it is pretty good; there are a few panels that stray into wonky territory. Snyder is a good inker for him, holds together the lines nicely.

But I can give you no real forecast or opinion on how the Puckett/Johnson era is going to be, because #23 reads like an inventory story. Maybe next month the new status quo will finally be established. Who knows? I'm still trying to get over the Goddamn Batman on page 4.
Rating: B-


With Ms. Marvel #23, Carol Danvers is back from the superheroine love-doll -- excuse me, living art -- farm in Chile just in time to have some sort of alien stick a tentacle through her spine. She becomes psychically connected to the alien, who in her mind looks like a hot blue chick with dreadlocks. Somewhere along the way, Machine Man gets a female body, continuing the meme started a few weeks ago with Hawkeye in "Marvel Zombies 2."

"Ms. Marvel" is just a good, readable comic. It's not quite Grant Morrison. But, much like the "Iron Man" monthly, if you follow it every month you get a pay off with an interesting supporting cast, a continuing story not bogged down too much with the event-of-the-hour, and a complex superheroine.

That said, a great deal of the success of "Ms. Marvel" is due to the work of artist Aaron Lopresti. Lopresti invests Carol Danvers with a very definite personality through his art. Yeah, it's a little cheesecakey at moments. But it's also very human. And I feel for Ms. Marvel through that art, those facial expressions, the way I did for "Strangers In Paradise" through Terry Moore's art. And I know that sound like the ultimate blasphemy, but it's the truth. Go look at Katchoo and Lopresti's Carol Danvers side-by-side.
Rating: B+

Monday, September 24, 2007

Superheroes (and villains) In Their Underpants

Girls With Slingshots artist Danielle Corsetto drew a ton of sketches of superpowered types in their underwear to help celebrate Comic Geek Speak's 300th episode. You can see more on the GWS site. I'm torn between MODOK & Supergirl as my favorite.

Sunday, September 23, 2007

Hot Comic Book Action!

...dedicated to the roughly 30% of new readers I receive daily who stumble upon this site looking for some smokin' superheroine action.

Supergirl-as-stripper "Smallville" promo images from Comic-by-Comic


Picture from the window of Jim Hanley's Universe taken this Saturday


for those "fire and ice" more adventuresome members of the audience (because domestic violence can be *hot* -- and men are always more stronger than women so they can never *really* be physically abused, so cute with women hitting them with their itty bitty little balled fists...)


The Ms. Marvel Bingo Sheet

...and something for the ladies!


The real reason there are so many female Green Lantern fans


Penance: a very sensitive young man (at least his extremities are)




Thursday, September 20, 2007

When Superheroines Vomit

Because you asked for it!

The hard-hitting story about alcohol abuse and minors that only DC could dare tell!

Starring Melissa Sue Anderson as "Wonder Girl" and Linda Blair as "Supergirl"

co-starring Scott Baio as "Speedy"



From this week's "Countdown," courtesy of scans daily

Thursday, August 30, 2007

Supergirl Speaks


Laura Vandervoort speaks to Wizard about her upcoming role as Kara in "Smallville":

"This version of Kara is based on the new relaunched character—the new Supergirl, who appeared in Superman/Batman and in her new series."

Translation: The producers were given a stack of the "bad girl" Supergirl comics a year or so ago as "research" into what DC was currently doing with her.

"She’s much more edgy and has a lot more attitude and is a lot more rebellious than previous versions."

Translation: Teh hotness.

"She’s technically older than Clark; she was older than him on Krypton and then because of some sort of hyperspace accident arrives on Earth younger."

Translation: It's not really barely legal but it sort of is as well.

When asked about the skimpiness of her outfit, she said:

"Yeah, well, Kara really gets into music and videos and takes her cues from music artists and what she sees on TV, so those are the cues that inform her outfits."

Translation: Britney chic.

Tuesday, August 28, 2007

Stuntcasting!

Playing Kara/Supergirl's aunt in "Smallville":


Thursday, August 09, 2007

Gary Frank's Supergirl -- Take Two


Wizard Universe has a nice set of Gary Frank sketches foreshadowing what we can expect from his new run on "Action Comics."

Frank is, without a doubt, one of my absolute favorite artists. And he draws women *good* (a little thin, but good).

When asked about the difficuties of making a female teenage character attractive but not over-sexualized, Frank said:

“The main thing is to keep her hips narrow and not go too crazy with the chest,” reveals Frank. “The legs needed to be kind of gangly, too, like those of a foal. "

For some reason I'm getting an image of Bambi running through my head, but ok.

Frank's Lois Lane, however, is the real gem of the lot:


Obvious Margot Kidder influence.

“I didn’t want her to be this tall, voluptuous beauty that takes men’s breath away when she enters a room. Geoff said that it was fine if no one noticed her when she entered the room, but after she had said her piece, all eyes would be on her when she left. For her build, I just wanted her to have strong, defined legs that looked made specifically for stomping in and out of editors’ offices.”

Gary Frank starts "Action Comics" with issue #858 in October.

Wednesday, August 08, 2007

Supergirl's Renato Guedes Donates Art To Girl-Wonder.Org's Art Auction

Renato Guedes donated a fly piece of Supergirl art to Girl-Wonder.Org's art auction to help support their organization.

The piece reads, "because capes aren't just for boys."

Renato contacted the site with the art piece and said he was a fan of the site and thankful for all the support he has gotten from the female fan community.

The auction is in October.

Tuesday, August 07, 2007

New "Supergirl" Art:
Awesome or "Fat & Ugly"?




"But the real draw here–no pun intended–is artist Renato Guedes, who does some truly wonderful work. Ever since her return at the hands of Mike Turner and the launch of the series with Ian Churchill, the latest version of Supergirl’s been criticized (rightly, if you asked me) for her rail-thin, oversexualized appearance, but here, Guedes’ work blows them all away, and he does it without offering exploitation and calling it beauty. Here’s hoping these guys stick around for a while, and that this book finally gets the readability it deserves."
--Chris's Invincible Super-Blog

"The skirt in this issue was way to long, it just didnt look right. Noone is saying to make the skirt super short but make it a few inches shorter to make it lookg good."
--From the Comic Bloc Forums

"Kara (for the first time ever in her own comic!) looks like a real living person. She's not a perfect twig of a Paris Hilton-clone supermodel, she looks like an actual living, breathing person. And admit it, we all know Paris Hilton is leader of the army of undead... just look at her! She shoulda ate more of those bologna sandwiches while she was in prison, clearly.
And Kara's emotions and feelings were all over her facial expressions as clear as day."

-- Superman HomePage

"Fifteen minutes ago Supergirl tried to stop the Amazons' attack and somewhere along the line morphed into a chunky, cankled cheerleader wanna be. Oh wait, that is just the new machination of Renato Guedes as he and Tony Bedard start their [hopefully short] run on the title. "

--Cory Teague, Silver Bullet Comics

"The photo-realism makes it very clear and believable but at times, it appears a bit stiff. Some panels are clearly laid out around Supergirl striking a heroic pose-- even to the point of crowding out the other elements in those panels. Still, it is refreshing to see Supergirl depicted realistically-- not as an underage sexpot."

--The Comic Book Bin

"This issue confirmed all my fears about the new creative team. How long is their stay on the title? I can't wait till it ends. Art is the worst we've seen on this title by far (they actually made Supergirl fat and ugly)"
"Making her fatter and uglier with those biker shorts... it just annoyed me and made me feel like Supergirl and her fans are getting punished."

--Two from the DC Message Boards

"The art was GREAT. And so was the story! The bitchiness and sluttiness is *poof* gone! Is this a new creative team on the book? If so, I just might become a regular reader! "
"This was a great issue. The art – pencils, inks and colours – of Renato Guedes is just lovely, with, as has been pointed out, Supergirl looking like a human being "

--Another two from the DC Message Boards

"She's totally not fat! XD
I LUFF HER :D
She looks teh awesome! ^_^
She's pretty, she's strong looking AND she looks relatable :D"

--Ami Angelwings

Note: If you think the image at the beginning of this post depicts an overweight young woman, you need to get your head examined.