Friday, September 21, 2007
Porn Comics Vs. Mature Readers Comics
If you haven't heard, there's a bit of a fracas going on in Guilford, CT concerning a teacher who gave a 14-year-old student a copy of Dan Clowes's "Eightball" to read.
The teacher has resigned, but the student's parents, who said that their daughter is now the target of other pupils angry that the teacher was forced to leave, think it's not enough of a punishment for him.
Add on top of that the fact that all these parents from the school district are seeing "Eightball," published by Fantagraphics Press and the book "Ghost World" appeared in, as "porn."
"Eightball" is not porn. "Wendy Whitebread, Undercover Slut" is porn. "Cherry Poptart" is porn.
Now, I read both "Wendy" & "Cherry" at the local comic shop where I worked when I was 16. Should I have had access to them? Was the shopkeeper responsible for keeping them out of the hands of me and my underage co-workers?
But what about comics like Gilbert Hernandez's "Birdland," which features crossover characters from "Love and Rockets" but has explicit sexual content? Or Kate Worley and Reed Waller's "Omaha The Cat Dancer?"
I read "Birdland" and "Omaha" too when I was in my late teens. I would posit that they have more artistic merit than "Cherry" and "Wendy," as the first two have somewhat of a story that exists outside of the sex and the latter two are straight porn narratives. (though that said, both "Cherry" and "Wendy" were well-drawn and occasionally witty, so it's not a knock on their creators)
For that matter, I read Judy Blume books written for teenagers with sexual content when I was 12!
The difference, I suppose, is in weighing the artistic merit of each work against its adult content. But who will do that? And will the citizens of Guilford have the same yardstick for assessing what is "art" as does New York City or Seattle? And does the medium of the graphic novel itself -- which has been so inextricably bound up in memories of their "funny book" roots -- confuse the issue even more?
Charles Brownstein of the Comic Book Legal Defense Fund commented on this point to the local press:
"Somebody could do a superficial glance of the material and not put the contextual pieces together, thereby perhaps seeing a panel with violence, perhaps seeing a panel with nudity and taking the image out of context as something that it’s not," he said. "The more people are educated about the category, the less those sorts of misunderstandings occur."
And while we are on the topic of mostly "indie" comics, what of more adult content in mainstream superhero titles?
Why is this:
so much more different than this:
That's why we have debate, opinions, and laws, folks. It's not black-and-white.
Well, "Cherry Poptart" is rather black-and-white. She has a best friend named "Patty Melt" and a boyfriend called Johnny F**kfaster. But you know what I'm sayin'.
Labels:
censorship,
cheesecake,
pornography,
women in comics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
As I've said elsewhere, and in my own post on the subject, a teacher I was friends with my junior year lent me a copy of Hothead Paisan.
ReplyDeleteLast that I checked, I am not homicidal, a lesbian, or a terrorist.
I know I wasn't the only kid reading Clan of the Cave Bear at 12, and The Mists of Avalon at 14.
Eightball isn't going to screw anyone up.
And, once more for the n00bs:
WHY DID THE TEACHER PICK THAT SPECIFIC COMIC?
That will affect everything, and that's the one piece of information no one seems to have obtained.
Well, from people who put Tintin comics in the adult section in their bookstores...
ReplyDelete