Pages

Showing posts with label Fantastic Four. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fantastic Four. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 06, 2009

Springboards For Controversy


I thought I would just lob a few opinions out there that might be controversial, or not, we'll see. Some have already been field-tested. :-)

1. I really really really enjoy the Mark Millar/Bryan Hitch Fantastic Four.
I do. The book looks beautiful. It presents the characters is a way that I can relate to and enjoy. This is the first time I've really felt motivated to keep up with the book as a monthly. And the interior artist also draws the cover -- bonus! And I even like the way the logo is composed on the cover. Sold.

2. Vertigo comics & trade paperbacks are printed on shit paper.
Yes. It's true. Why go through all the trouble of producing something like Northlanders only to print it on shit paper? Are the trades for Northlanders printed on shit paper too? The key is not so much the paper itself -- rough, one step up from newsprint -- but the color palettes used. Books like Scalped, Northlanders, and Hellblazer usually have darker, moodier palettes. These are rich palettes. You can't have these palettes on crap paper, because the paper can't "hold" that richness. Rich color on crap paper looks like murk. Now, I can understand if you are doing it for the monthlies. But the trades too? Read a trade for Scalped -- shit paper. Surely these better-selling Vertigo titles deserve something better? Yeah, I know that keeps the price-point down -- but at the cost of making the book look like a murky smear?

3. Gender might impact one's creative output.
Certainly not in all cases! But there might be general trends. I just don't buy that gender has zero impact on creative output. I mean -- zero impact? Really? I'm just the same as a man? That's bullshit, I'm not the same as a man. My "wiring" is not the same as a man's. My hormones are not the same as a man's. The immediate, everyday details of life that I instinctively observe are different. I'll say it: I care more about emotions and feelings. And I'm saying this as someone who considers herself a bit more "mannish" than the average woman. Does denying these differences really help me? It's like some corporate chick when I was working in advertising, she told me to never admit you menstruate. Fuck -- I menstruate! I'm not going to mention it at the board meeting. But I fucking bleed, and I get bloated and feel shitty and emotional too.

The problem comes when the idea I have outlined gets interpreted as meaning (for example) "women don't write as good as men." Obviously, this is not the case. JK Rowling, Patricia Cornwell, Anne Rice. That chick who wrote "Twilight." Multi-billion dollar authors. But my point is: why is this not yet translating to the comic book market in the numbers that it should? How does a female writer work with a comic publisher to maximize her strengths and audience potential? Does she do it by positioning herself as "another Geoff Johns/Brian Michael Bendis?" Or does she do it by saying: "Yeah, I'm different. Different and awesome. And it's exactly my difference that's going to sell this book." That's the key -- how do we use this natural difference in a way to sell the product?

4. I think the direction of Amazing Spider-Man post-"Brand New Day" has worked.
I tried to approach the Spider-Man comics several years ago and gave up. That "Other" storyline? I couldn't follow that. The continuity had become impenetrable for me. As a new reader, I was turned off. But now, I feel I have been given an even platform onto which to begin my re-involvement with Spidey. And buying the weekly books has just become a habit. I might not read all of them right away. I read the arcs in chunks. But it works for me. I guess it becomes a question of, should comic book companies try to grab new readers on longtime titles? Can we streamline the continuity a bit? Like in Invincible Iron Man. And I think you periodically need to do that.

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Thursday, February 28, 2008

Assorted Marvel News

First, the latest Marvel skrull promo to make its way into my inbox:
Perhaps to make up for the lack of Marvel info at WonderCon, Marvel conducted an impromptu press call yesterday to announce a bunch of news:

* The upcoming Cable series will be a "sci-fi spaghetti western" and definitely takes place in the current X-men continuity.
Cable really isn't the big mega-star he used to be, is he? I mean, I remember when he was like in the top 5 Marvel superheroes. Maybe that will change?

*Garth Ennis will be making his final Punisher arc, and Tim Bradstreet will depart with him.
Will certainly be the end of an era, but maybe it's time for new blood on the title, so to speak. Jason Aaron?

* The Hulk is definitely not coming back to The Incredible Herc book. Fate of puppy still up in air.
Good, I like that it's Herc's book. Killing the puppy is just mean tho.

* Fantastic Four with Bryan Hitch is penciled through #562, and will (gasp!) come out on schedule.
Must have had him working on this book way in advance. Which is how DC got Jim Lee's "Batman: Hush" out on time. Maybe there is a lesson in this for editors.

* Apparently the cover of Guardians Of The Galaxy #2 is so controversial it can only be spoke of in whispers.
Maybe it's a shot of Vance Astro with a really big package. Painted by Alex Ross.

* Matt Fraction's Invincible Iron Man will have "more variant covers than you can shake a stick at."
Oh boy I hope some have holograms.

* The next Dan Slott Spider-Man arc in May will have...
"..Something that all of the Spidey readers – the guys that love us right now, and the guys that hate us right now have been asking for.”
Return of MJ?

*Hulk #4 is apparently some really big patooties -- with the shocking reappearance of an old character and a supposedly awesome battle.
As long as Jeph Loeb stops doing those scenes where everything looks normal and then you turn the page and the Hulk jumps out of nowhere. That works on film, not so much in comics (especially if you have to turn the page).

And the latest rumor on teh internets is that Amadeus Cho is really Red Hulk -- what do you think? I thought it was Doc Samson.

Oh, and I saw those "Invaders" preview pages with Cap and the rest -- it's like the same creative team as Project Superpowers (crossover?). Nice stuff.

And I've been hearing some faint rumblings about events in Skrull Invasion...all I have to say is, if those rumors are true, "oh my God." And that's all I'm going to say. Wow. A lot of people will be writing in their blogs.

I'm done writing in this one -- for this post at least!

(Howard the Duck is really a Skrull -- that would explain how he looked in his last miniseries)

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Quickie Reviews: Goon #21, X-Force #1, Salvation Run #4, Dead of Night #1, Fantastic Four #554


The Goon #21:
This issue is a change of pace, possessing a more somber, apocalyptic tone to it than the book usually has (the quiet, moody cover perhaps a tip-off). That does not mean there are is not sheep-shaving, however. Oh yes -- there is sheep-shaving.
Rating: A
Buy another issue? Yes



X-Force #1: An unusually gory affair that places Logan in the role of whiny tight-assed party-pooper. When Scott Summers is more adventurous than you, you're in trouble. A serviceable story brought to life by the unique and surrealistically realistic art of Clayton Crain.
Rating: B
Buy another issue? I'll try the arc.



Salvation Run #4: The book is starting to miss Bill Willingham, this issue's biggest selling point being a long-drawn out fight between Monsieur Mallah & Gorilla Grodd. Intelligent gorillas beating each other senseless sells. And how did Joker kick Grodd off the cliff?
Rating: B
Buy another issue? Well, I've got this far haven't I?



Dead of Night #1: This Marvel Max horror series is framed like Tales of The Crypt but has more in common with Warren's old Creepy series. Kano's art is amazing and gives the book a far more "indy" feel.
Rating: A-
Buy another issue? Yes



Fantastic Four #554: I wasn't going to buy this but was swayed by Comics Are Expensive's review. Bryan Hitch presents a cinematic tableau that just draws me in and surrounds me. Mark Millar's Fantastic Four seems to combine the best qualities of Lee/Kirby, the movie version, and Millar's own style.
Rating: A
Buy another issue? Part of me wants to just wait for the hardcover.

What if The Fantastic Four Movie Was Made in the 1960s?


There are moments in the day where a surreal e-mail like this is a welcome break from the world...

OS reader David Miller suggests the following cast for The Fantastic Four if it was made in the mid-1960s..

Russell Johnson as Reed Richards

Ernest Borgnine as Thing

Donnna Douglas (from the Beverly Hillbillies) as Sue Storm

Michael Landon as Johnny Storm



Ted Cassidy as Galactus

I would pay so much money to see this movie, it is not even funny. Just to see Lurch in the tall purple hat.

Friday, February 15, 2008

Comics Are Expensive: Fantastic Four #554, Tiny Titans #1, Nova Annual #1, Uncanny X-Men #495

This week’s installment of Comics Are Expensive is a little smaller than intended – the Wednesday before payday is never kind to new books, and I just couldn’t swing the $14.99 to pick up the second TPB of Mike Carey’s Crossing Midnight. I plan on making up for it next week, though, and with any luck I’ll finally grab the new Scalped trade as well. Second column and already behind? I’m rubbish, me.

But let’s get on with it, shall we? As with last week, potential spoilers lurk ahead. You’ve been warned.

FANTASTIC FOUR #554


Writer: Mark Millar

Artist: Brian Hitch

I very nearly left this on the stands. In the last few years, Mark Millar’s name (fun fact: pronounced “Mill-ER”, not “Mill-AR”) on a book has gone from being a guarantee that the contents would at least be fun to a messy game of Russian roulette – recent issues from him have had a 50/50 chance of being something solid like the first issue of Civil War or turning out to be a complete mess (like, say, much of the rest of Civil War). The days of quality work like Superman: Red Son or the first twelve issues of The Ultimates began to feel like a lifetime ago, and all signs seem to point towards him heading directly up his own ass at Bendis-like speeds.

Fantastic Four #554 doesn’t disprove any of this – it is, after all, just one issue, and there’s a good bit of damage to undo. It is, however, enough to give me hope that that the mad idea factory responsible for Millar’s earlier work hasn’t been completely consumed by overused Hollywood-cool imagery and lazy shock moments. From the very beginning, with the time-tossed FF careening stuck between angry Native Americans and a hard place on the way home from some adventure, it feels more like what Millar is capable of than anything he’s produced in a while.

As much as Dwayne McDuffie’s all-too-brief run captured the relationships between the characters (and made up for a lot of Straczynski’s nonsense), this issue taps into the other half of the formula responsible making the Fantastic Four so much fun when done right: they’re explorers first, superheroes second. Family jaunts into the past, lecturing school children on the ins and outs of an anti-Galactus suit, your husband’s ex teleporting into the living room when you’re in the middle of setting up a charity to help the victims of superhuman incidents – just another Tuesday afternoon at the Baxter Building. If this issue is any indication, it’s safe to assume Millar understands this completely, and is digging in with all the vigor of a kid discovering a new playground.

Hitch on art is a natural choice, given his long history of working with Millar, and it’s nice for him to have the chance to prove he can be as deft at capturing character moments as he is when laying out fight scenes in excruciating detail. Reed and Ben facing a classroom full of eight-year-olds is every bit as fun as the two-page spread just before the end of the book, which is just how it should be in a book like Fantastic Four. I didn’t know what to expect from this issue, and find myself cautiously blown away by how much I enjoyed it. There’s no telling if Millar and Hitch can keep it up, but if future issues can keep up half the sense of wonder and fun found here then it could very well be the best thing either of them have done in years.

BUY STATUS: Count me in for the next one, so long as Millar continues to leave his famous bag of tics at home.


TINY TITANS #1


Writer: Art Baltazar & Franco

Artist: Art Baltazar

This book isn’t for me. I’ve known that since the first images of the unspeakably adorable Tiny Titans came out last year. This hasn’t stopped me from looking forward to it, or from being excited at the idea these uber-cute takes on the characters getting their own book. Jump rope of truth? Kid Devil made somehow even more awesome? What’s not to like?

So now the book is out, and after reading it through twice, yeah, it’s not for me. The only trouble is, I’m genuinely not sure who it’s meant to be for. Considering its place in the Johnny DC line as a replacement for Teen Titans Go!, one would assume it’s meant for younger fans of the defunct show. Only no, because the way the book is presented – a collection of short vignettes with a joke at the end – is probably too young for fans of the previous title’s action-packed adventures.

So maybe younger readers then, the ones who watched the show with their older brothers and sisters? Perhaps, but a lot of the jokes here demand some prior knowledge of the show or DC-proper comic, particularly the ones about Raven’s and Rose’s dads. That pretty much leaves older readers, the ones who grew up on Teen Titans or at least recognize the characters and maybe have kids of their own. Again, maybe, but once you get past the super-cute (and admittedly great) art style, there’s really not a lot here.

I was hoping the book would follow the issue-long antics of the kids in the style of the Marvel Adventures line, but that’s not the case here. While I can largely understand the decision to have each issue be a bunch of sketches, it doesn’t quite work when most of the gags read as in-jokes for an older audience than the format seems to be aimed at.

We know kids are fine with more complex plots as long as the goals of the characters are clear (e.g., Harry wants to stop Voldemort and protect his friends, the Autobots want to defeat the Decepticons and save Earth, Ben Tennyson wants to protect the Omnitrix from Vilgax, etc.), so why the change to simpler stories? And if DC is hoping to target a younger audience than the hypothetical kids reading the other superhero titles in the Johnny DC line, why tie so many of the jokes into Titans continuity they likely don’t care about?

Then again, maybe I’m over-thinking this whole thing. Maybe younger kids will get right away that Slade is a bad guy, and that’s why having him be the new principle of Sidekick City Elementary is funny. Or maybe enough adults will buy the book for the art style alone (which, again, is super-cute in ways that need to be seen to be believed), and that’s all DC are hoping to accomplish. Either way, I’ll be interested to see if this book can find it’s audience, if only so I know who the hell they are.

Buy Status: I have a personal rule about new books get three issues to find their feet, so I’m in for the next two. Great as the art is, it’s not exactly promising at this point, though.


NOVA ANNUAL #1


Writers: Dan Abnett & Andy Lanning

Artists: Mahmud A. Asrar, Kelbs & Wellinton Alves

The last two years or so in comics have revealed a great personal truth to me: I really, really like well-written comics about space cops. Between Johns’ Green Lantern run since the One Year Later jump (particularly the super awesome – shut up, Gallaher – Sinestro Corps storyline) and the solid gold of Nova ever since Xandar and his fellow corpsmen were nuked at the beginning of Annihilation, it’s a love that has been extremely well fed. While I haven’t yet managed to pick a favorite between them, Nova has a definite advantage going for it: I’m a sucker for hopeless causes.

Of course, it helps considerably that writers Abnett and Lanning have made Richard Rider, last of the Centurions, the sort of hopeless cause you really can’t help but believe in. This issue only drives that point further home, intertwining his origin as Nova with one of many possible futures spinning out of his current bout with the Phalanx’s techno-virus (things I love more than space cops? Grim futures where there is ONLY WAR).

It’s a nice jumping on point for new readers before the big push to the end of the current arc, summing up Richard’s recent troubles while depositing him on the doorstep of what promises to be a hell of a fight. I’m still a bit worried that the techno-virus is a way of neutering the characters off-the-scale power levels from here on out, but it looks like Nova #11 will go a long ways towards settling that. Either way, I have every faith in the creative team to continue giving me reasons to come back next month.

Buy Status: Still resting comfortably at the top of my reading pile every time it comes out. It’s reached the point where I can’t imagine a month going by without reading the line “It is critical that you pay attention at this time”, though I’m also a fan of “TELL ME HOW TO SHOOT STUFF OUT OF MY HANDS!” from this issue.


UNCANNY X-MEN #495


Writer: Ed Brubaker

Artist: Mike Choi

Why did no one tell me the X-Men were good again? Sure, OS reader Sammy did, and I bought this issue on his recommendation, but an earlier head’s up or something from the world at large would have been appreciated. Was Messiah Complex this good? What else are you people hiding from me?

I tried Brubaker on X-men back when “Deadly Genesis” was coming out, but the whole Vulcan/third Summers brother/Shi’ar nonsense became so tedious so quickly that I ditched it with no plans to ever look back. Based on that first impression, “X-Men: Divided” is a tremendous turnaround quality-wise, chock-full of moments that go a long way towards reminding me why I bothered caring about these characters in the first place. While nothing necessarily exciting happens (this is, after all, the calm both after the last storm and before the next one), Brubaker serves up a handful of character moments that show a deep understanding of how these different characters work and how much fun it can be to put them against each other.

The Scott and Emma stuff is particularly well handled – their conversation after Scott’s pissing match with Tony Stark, the snapshots of their Savage Land vacation... all of it rang true in a way the Cyclops and Phoenix romance never did. I’ve been a fan of the character Summers was becoming with Emma Frost in his life ever since Morrison’s run on New X-Men run (coincidentally, also the last time I could be bothered with Marvel’s mutants before now), and watching him open up after years of repression is the sort of character development I never knew he was capable of.

What else? I liked the bit with Nightcrawler, Logan, and Colossus playing pranks on each other in Germany. I liked the bit inside of Cyclops’ mind as he worked out how to take down two fully-grown Triceratops. I liked the end-of-issue tease of Angel’s email calling the couple back to the real world, and the slight tinge of fear in his last lines as what was left of his consciousness trickled away. I like all off it, and it’s been years since an X-book made me feel that way.

If there’s a failing to be found, it’s that the issue isn’t really the sort of jumping-on point you need after a major (and more importantly, largely well-received) crossover. I’ve flipped through enough of Messiah Complex to know what’s meant by the references to Xavier’s condition and the new hope for mutants, but neither of these points or the other major consequences of the last few month’s worth of adventures are really clear here. Not that it really hurt my enjoyment – Uncanny X-Men #495 has exactly the sort of feel I want from the title, and for the first time in ages I’m genuinely excited about what comes next.

Buy Status: On board, provided Vulcan and further misadventures in space stay well away. Bonus points to artist extraordinaire Mike Choi and his shout-out to Comic Foundry.

That should about do it for this week. Also picked up was Green Lantern Corps #21, which while fleshing out the rather great arrival of the Alpha Lantern's in last week's Green Lantern wasn't nearly as much fun as issue #20's scenes with Mongul and his new yellow power ring. As always, recommendations via the comments thread of email sent to chrislamb@gmail.com are more than appreciated. See you next week.

you can also read more of Chris's stuff at Expertologist

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Occasional Links: The Surprising Spider-Man Edition


Your friendly Neighborhood Occasional Links


Wonder Woman Vs. Namor In A Swordfight


Who would win?

Highlights:

"She can decapitate with her tiara."

"I meant for this to only be a swordfight. No other weapons (like tiaras and lassos and such.)"

Got that? Stop screwing around. This is a serious debate!



Fortuna: Another Caped Do-Gooder Roaming The Streets, Making Multimedia Art Installations


"Masked, caped and packing a staple gun, a do-gooder known by the moniker Fortuna stalks the Wicker Park streets, tagging barren walls with posters announcing her dominance over evil. She's literally your friendly neighborhood superhero."

I heard Top Cow might be getting the rights to this, but they're going to have to add some cybernetic demon-hand pasties.


Gwen Stacy: Mexican Pinup Queen



Again With The Comics explores the Mexican 60's/70's reprint series "The Surprising Spider-Man":

I also have to wonder, are these stories considered canon to Mexican collectors? Is "Misterio del vampiro de la playa del bikiní" held in the same esteem as, say, the Master Planner arc or the Stone Tablet Saga? Inquiring, idiotic minds want to know!

As you can see, there was some effort made by the editors of "The Surprising Spider-Man" to capitalize on Gwen Stacy's... (don't say "assets," don't say "assets"...)


I like the idea that somebody on their staff actually had to draw a big ass onto Gwen. Like, that was an actual instruction that person received. "More ass! We've got to sell these damn comics!"


Gay and Bisexual Characters In Comics



Clip n' save this handy list, take it with you to your local comic book store, courtesy of The Gay League.

Some reflections on the list:

1) The "Bi" list seems to be made up of a lot of hot women and Mephisto. Draw your own conclusions.

2) "Doctor Stingaree" is gay. In case you were wondering.

3) Anybody remember back in Morrison's "Doom Patrol" when "Danny The Street" turned out to be gay? He was a friggin' street. He was a street with a distinct sexual orientation. Welcome to highbrow comix.

4) "Tlaango" is gay. Just in case you were debating it.

5) Is it a rule of comics that all gay characters have to have wacky names? Like you'll have a lesbian couple in some Vertigo book with the names "Pussywillow and Hotbox." Oh, that's clever. Welcome to highbrow comix.

6) Skyppi The Skrull has an "uncertain sexual orientation." Just in case you were wondering. Actually, I heard they are going to retcon that; he was really Black Bolt in disguise.


Video: "The Fantastic Four Song"


FANTASTIC FOUR SONG - Ray Wall Band

Add to My Profile | More Videos

Monday, December 17, 2007

Whatta Revoltin' Development This Is!


But when I heard "Billie Jean" play on the radio at the local coffee shop the other day, I tapped my feet -- I really did.

Thursday, September 27, 2007

Barbie Storm


Diamond Select's "Formalwear Sue Storm" limited edition statue.


Hey don't get me wrong, it's a nice statue and all...and a bit more respectable than that Mary Jane thing a while back (remember?).

But what makes this image distinct from just any old everyday good-looking blond in an evening-dress?

I mean, they could have at least made one of the arms in a see-thru resin or something to give the illusion that she was using her powers.

Who is the market for "Formalwear Sue Storm," anyway? She's too clothed for the "removable skirt" anime statue crowd.

"Formalwear Sue Storm"...you know what this reminds me of?

Friday, August 03, 2007

A Meditation On Teh Boobage


The Supergirl "Smallville" promo photos + Diva Lea = trouble. I knew when I saw the pics earlier in the week that simply no good could come of it, that these shots of Laura Vandervoort with the tube top and the boobies were going to piss her off, and piss off a portion of bloggers in general.

Though we have a newly-visioned "Supergirl" on the stands, it is obvious that that the "Smallville" producers used the "Space Lolita" version for their research & development. But what really bugged me is that after reading Lea's posts on the subject I took a double-take at the photo in question and said to myself: "God, those breasts are HUGE."

The breasts are huge. Nothing wrong with that. If, as Lea posits, some photoshoppery has been done to enhance said boobage, then yeah that's kind of creepy -- though really common.

It immediately brought to mind another photo, this time of Emily Watson on the "Harry Potter and the Order Of The Phoenix" poster. Her under-age boobage is not so very prominent in-and-of-itself -- except for the way she is positioned on the poster. And then, when Googling images of the poster, I found out something a bit more interesting -- on some versions of the same poster her boobs are smaller than others.



Is Watson simply maturing at a faster rate than a family movie can allow? Was a digital reduction in order? Such a situation reminds me of the situation Mouseketeer Annette Funicello faced fifty years ago, when her burgeoning bosoms had to be strapped down as to not scandalize teh childrens.

An impromptu meditation on teh boobage could not be complete without mentioning, in my opinion, the queen of movie poster boobage, Jennifer-Love Hewitt. Her poster for "I Still Know What You Did Last Summer" is an absolute classic. Contrast it with the poster for "Can't Hardly Wait," another Hewitt film out the same year. Notice the disparity in mammary size. Was there a reduction or an addition?


Is photoshopping bigger boobs tantamount to the steroids scandal in professional sports? Is it false advertising?

The last boobage I wish to contemplate, at least on this cheery New York morn, is that of Jessica Alba as the Invisible Woman on movie posters for "The Fantastic Four." Note that in the first "coming soon" posters, her breasts are very pronounced. But then the images on subsequent posters become far more demure, until in "Rise Of The Silver Surfer" she is just a head.


Why no further exploitation of the formidable Alba physique? Perhaps it is tacit acknowledgement that, in the final analysis, the "FF" flicks are essentially children's movies. We are back in Mouseketeer territory.

Thursday, July 12, 2007

Chiklis: Fanboyz
Iz The Crazzzzziest Peoplez




Michael Chiklis is quoted recently as telling Maxim:

"Fantastic Four fans are a rabid fanboy geek set."

Well you're the frickin' THING. Suck it up!

Sunday, June 17, 2007

Silver Surfer In The Latest FF Movie...

Didn't it seem like the Silver Surfer was too good for the film? Like when they hire Christopher Lee for "Gremlins 2" or John Hurt/William Hurt for most of the films they do. It's like between all the goofy Mr. Fantastic stretch scenes and Julian McMahon pouting evilly at the camera you dropped down the comic book equivalent of Jesus and he's like in a completely different film. Surfer's in a Ingmar Bergman film, everybody else is in "The Goonies 6."

You can picture some high-brow interviewer like that "Inside The Actors Studio" guy or NPR chatting with Surfer about his career in film. And when they get to "FF 2" Surfer just flashes an apologetic smile and says, "well, I did it for the money." He did it for the money. So he can have the luxury to do those smaller indie films.

Norrin Radd -- he did it for the money. But for the Art as well.

Thursday, June 14, 2007

Skrulls Among us?!

The latest "New Avengers" had me thinking...

Is there really a whole nefarious underground of Skrulls impersonating human beings?

Here are some contenders: